Equaliberty: Political Essays (a John Hope Franklin Center by Étienne Balibar, James Ingram

By Étienne Balibar, James Ingram

First released in French in 2010, Equaliberty brings jointly essays by way of Étienne Balibar, one of many preeminent political theorists of our time. The e-book is prepared round equaliberty, a time period coined through Balibar to connote the strain among the 2 beliefs of contemporary democracy: equality (social rights and political illustration) and liberty (the freedom electorate need to contest the social contract). He unearths the stress among those other kinds of rights to be ingrained within the structure of the fashionable geographical region and the modern welfare country. whilst, he seeks to maintain rights discourse open, eschewing common entitlements in desire of a deterritorialized citizenship that may be accelerated and invented anew within the age of globalization. Deeply engaged with different thinkers, together with Arendt, Rancière, and Laclau, he posits a concept of the polity in keeping with social relatives. In Equaliberty Balibar brings either the continental and analytic philosophical traditions to endure at the conflicted kin among humanity and citizenship.

Show description

Read Online or Download Equaliberty: Political Essays (a John Hope Franklin Center Book) PDF

Best history & theory books

Making the Political: Founding and Action in the Political Theory of Zhang Shizhao

Democratic political thought usually sees collective motion because the foundation for non-coercive social switch, assuming that its phrases and practices are continually self-evident and obtainable. yet what if we discover ourselves in occasions the place collective motion isn't instantly on hand, or perhaps generally intelligible?

Theology and the Soul of the Liberal State (Graven Images)

Emerging calls in either the us and in another country for theologizing nationwide agendas have renewed examinations approximately even if liberal states can accommodate such courses with out both endangering electorate' rights or trivializing non secular issues. traditional knowledge means that theology is inevitably unfriendly to the liberal country, yet neither philosophical research nor empirical argument has convincingly confirmed that end.

Abolition Movement, Edition: annotated edition

The perform of African slavery has been defined because the United States's so much shameful sin. Undoing this tradition was once an extended, advanced fight that lasted centuries and finally drove the US to a sour civil struggle. After an advent that locations the United States's kind of slavery right into a international, old point of view, writer T.

Additional info for Equaliberty: Political Essays (a John Hope Franklin Center Book)

Sample text

Indeed, no time was lost in reproaching it for this, and this was what very quickly led to the dissociation, in one way or another, of man and citizen, or the rights of man and the rights of the citizen, while we find here the confirmation of their coincidence in the revolutionary moment, from which the act of enunciation (the Declaration) is inseparable. Not only does the Declaration not install any "human nature" before society and political order as an underlying foundation or external guarantee; it integrally identifies the rights of man with political rights and, in this way, shortcircuits theories of human nature as weIl as those of theological supernature, identifying man, individual or collective, with a member ofpolitical society.

These formulations do more than compensate for the absence of equality in the enumeration of Article 2; they reverse its meaning, making equality the principle or right that efTectively ties aIl the others together. 44 CHAPTER 1 The treatment of equality in the Declaration is precisely the site of the strongest and most precise identification of man and citizen. Indeed, no time was lost in reproaching it for this, and this was what very quickly led to the dissociation, in one way or another, of man and citizen, or the rights of man and the rights of the citizen, while we find here the confirmation of their coincidence in the revolutionary moment, from which the act of enunciation (the Declaration) is inseparable.

On the contrary, with the TIlermidorian Declaration of 1795, centered on the untouchable character of property and the reciprocity of rights and duties, a determinate social foundation is substituted for the natural, universal foundation of citizenship: there is a rupture, even a reversaI. This of course expresses counterrevolutionary reaction to the development of social conflicts, and especially to the way the popular, nonbourgeois elements of the Revolution continually used the universalism of the rights of man politically, against the practical restrictions placed on them by their own authors-the distinction between active and passive citizenship on a censitary basis, and the exclusion of de facto equality from the domain of natural rights.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.43 of 5 – based on 3 votes