By Edwin Diamond
"Edwin Diamond's Behind the Times units the Paper of list straight—a attention-grabbing examine the folks and guidelines, the dissension and debate at the back of the possible serene masthead of the New York Times. No newsroom is a backyard of Eden, and merely the infrequent reporter wears a halo: the Times, now not strangely, is a less than excellent position. yet Edwin Diamond is cautious to notice the triumph in addition to the turmoil at this nice American newspaper. the result's a window at the altering international of journalism today."—Dan Rather
Read Online or Download Behind the Times: Inside the New New York Times PDF
Similar Journalism books
Given that September eleven, 2001, Seymour M. Hersh has riveted readers -- and outraged the Bush management -- along with his explosive tales within the New Yorker, together with his headline-making items at the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. Now, Hersh brings jointly what he has realized, besides new reporting, to reply to the serious query of the final 4 years: How did the USA get from the transparent morning while planes crashed into the area alternate middle to a divisive and soiled warfare in Iraq?
Chris Terrill is a guy looking for his restrict. he is fifty five years outdated. he isn't a soldier. he's being proficient through the Royal Marines and he's going to Afghanistan. the one distinction is that rather than a gun, Chris can be retaining a digital camera and filming the full ordeal for a massive television sequence. The Royal Marines Commando education base in Lympstone Devon has a well-known motto: "99.
A testomony to the strength and creativity of a author and journalist the ultimate all through his writing occupation Charles Dickens was once a highly prolific journalist. This quantity of his later paintings is chosen from items that he wrote after he based the magazine family phrases in 1850, up till his dying in 1870.
The arguable journalistic research of the mentality that fostered the Holocaust Originally showing as a sequence of articles in The New Yorker, Hannah Arendt’s authoritative and gorgeous file at the trial of Nazi chief Adolf Eichmann sparked a flurry of discussion upon its book. This revised version contains fabric that got here to gentle after the trial, in addition to Arendt’s postscript at once addressing the talk that arose over her account.
Additional resources for Behind the Times: Inside the New New York Times
Oakes however desired to cease the editorial; and, if he failed at that, he could attempt to blunt its results. “I protested, evidently. certain, the writer has the ultimate say, yet i presumed to myself: I can’t countenance this. ” He thought of, and brushed off, the assumption of a dramatic public resignation over the “forced” Moynihan endorsement: “Since i used to be already devoted to depart, it can were a foolish gesture to surrender. ” at the forty-five-minute ferry trip to Woods gap he attempted to compose his anti-Moynihan suggestions on a memo pad. Then, from a pay cell on the dock, his automobile parked along, his fourteen-year-old at the back of the automobile awaiting him, Oakes talked to Punch Sulzberger. “I informed him, ‘It’s my accountability to be heard. ’ ” Oakes then requested Sulzberger, “ ‘What approximately me writing a rebuttal to seem at the web page in addition to the endorsement? ’ ” Punch considered it for a second, after which agreed. “Later I dictated an extended rebuttal to Hechinger, giving Moynihan what for. ” (Candidate Moynihan, the rebuttal stated, “is captivating, hugely articulate, and definitely clever; yet then so are many different opportunistic showmen. ”) Hechinger despatched Oakes’s reproduction to the composing room; it was once set for 8 paragraphs, and ran simply over 450 phrases. On orders of the writer, it by no means seemed within the instances. in its place, the following day’s variation, dated September eleven, carried a one-paragraph, forty-word model of the unique. It was once signed by means of Oakes and seemed within the letters-to-the-editor column—Oakes writing to Oakes. The word easily expressed “disagreement” with the Moynihan endorsement. On Tuesday, Moynihan received the first with 36 percentage of the vote, to Abzug’s 35 percentage, a distinction of round 9 thousand votes. the tale didn't finish there. Roger Wilkins, the only black member of the editorial board, wrote an editorial for the distance occasionally reserved for editorial board participants to talk less than their very own bylines. Wilkins attacked Moynihan’s perspectives of black the USA, and referred to as his supporters “misinformed and usually really flawed. ” He made no point out of the days endorsement. Wilkins’s Op-Ed piece was once grew to become in to Oakes on Monday and scheduled for the variants of Tuesday, basic day. Monday evening, Sulzberger stepped in back, and ordered Oakes to not run the Wilkins column until eventually tomorrow, after the votes have been counted. Wednesday’s variations of the days carried Wilkins’s piece at the Op-Ed web page and information of Moynihan’s victory on web page one. The episode left a legacy of bitterness. Roger Wilkins made up our minds that, as he placed it, “I didn’t are looking to write editorials from now on. ” He prepared with Sulzberger to do an city affairs column below the jurisdiction of the inside track division and Abe Rosenthal (who had helped recruit him on the Times). years later, he made up our minds to depart the days. The paper’s look for consensus from Wilkins’s point of view as a black American appeared much less centrist than conservative. He used to be slightly chatting with Rosenthal. Sulzberger and Wilkins persevered to have a formal expert dating; in line with Wilkins, “If there has been anything critical to speak about, i may continuously move as much as his place of work on the finish of the day and he’d repair me a martini and we’d sit down and speak.